Legal Opinion

Johnson v. First Student, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 14, 2008Published

1Dissent

Rose, J. (dissenting).

We respectfully dissent because we cannot agree with plaintiffs’ argument that the occurrence of a rear-end collision here establishes a prima facie case of negligence against defendants, requiring them to provide an adequate, nonnegligent explanation of the accident. While it would have been appropriate for Supreme Court to have given the pattern instruction informing the jury that defendants had the burden to provide such an explanation (see NY PJI 2:83), the court did not do so and plaintiffs failed to object to its omission either before or after the jury charge was…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Martin v. City of CohoesNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Sega v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Mitchell v. New York HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Cullen v. NaplesNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. Guilder v. Corinth Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API