Richman v. Hoppin
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SPARKS, Circuit 'Judge.
Appellants brought this action for partition of real estate and to quiet title thereto. They claim title by virtue of a deed made on August 27, 1862, by Franklin Fassitt and his wife in consideration of $500 paid by Charles T. Hoppin, Sarah Louisa Hoppin, Mary Eliza - Hoppin, and Charles Hoppin, the three last named being the children of Eliza Hoppin, deceased, former wife of said Charles T. Hoppin. The granting clause is as follows: “Grant, bargain and sell unto the said Charles T. Hoppin for and during his natural life and at his death to the said Sarah Louisa Hoppin,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Kuhn v. Fairmont Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Summers v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
- Gannon v. PetersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
- Harder v. MatthewsIllinois Supreme Court · 1923
- Winchell v. WinchellIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.