Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Zisook

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 17, 1981No. 80-306PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant below, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of plaintiffs Irving and Jean Zisook. Because the affidavits and depositions presented by State Farm in opposition to the motion raise questions as to whether Zisook effectively rejected higher levels of uninsured motorist coverage, we find that there is not an absence of a genuine issue of material fact. Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966); Perez, II v. City of Miami, 358 So.2d 1132 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Villa v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co., 354 So.2d 122 (Fla. 3d DCA…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. REFLEX, NV v. Umet TrustDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  2. Perez v. City of MiamiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  3. Villa v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Zisook v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  2. Yambo v. General American Life InsuranceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  3. Ambassador Insurance v. OperDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API