Legal Opinion
Claim of Andrello v. Hotel Oneida & Bruno's Beach House
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 13, 1990PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeals (1) from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed October 20, 1988, which ruled that chiropractic treatments received by claimant were compensable, and (2) from a decision of said Board, filed July 31, 1989, which denied the application of the employer and its carrier for reconsideration of the original decision.
The Workers’ Compensation Board properly rejected as untimely the claim that the chiropractic treatment received by claimant was excessive. The application for Board review was not made within 30 days of the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Law Judge…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Claim of Eberle v. New York State Department of Mental HygieneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Murtaugh v. Bankers Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Claim of Oliva v. Albany Cycle Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Claim of Gray v. Williams Press, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
3Cited by2 opinions
- Claim of Friss v. City of Hudson Police DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Claim of McCurty v. Syracuse UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006