Stanley v. State
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from County Court, Oklahoma County; W. R. Taylor, Judge. Proceeding bv the ^ ('.pj-i-ain personal property as contraband under the prohibition laws; Jack Stanley and others intervening as owners or lienholders. Judgment for the State, and interveners bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.
This was a proceeding for the purpose of trying the right of property in certain wearing apparel, household furniture, musical instruments, etc., seized by a police officer for an alleged violation of the prohibitory law committed in his presence. Upon trial to a jury there was verdict in favor of the state upon which judgment was duly entered, to reverse which this proceeding in error was commenced.
The plaintiffs in error assign numerous grounds for reversing the judgment of the trial court, nearly all of which were predicated upon the theory that the property involved was seized under…
2Cited by6 opinions
- State v. LeeOregon Supreme Court · 1927
- Ashbrook v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Washington v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1937
- Miles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
- Pueblo v. OcasioSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.