Legal Opinion

Gdowski v. Louie

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 27, 2000No. B125408PublishedCited by 7 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

VOGEL (C. S.), P. J.

Introduction

Diana Gdowski and James S. and Roella Louie own adjoining properties in a residential subdivision in Palos Verdes Estates. Following heavy rains in January 1995, Gdowski’s home was flooded and severely damaged. By a cross-complaint, Gdowski (plaintiff) sued the Louies (defendants), claiming they were responsible for her loss because their landscaping had altered the natural flow of the surface waters.

A jury trial was conducted which resulted in a defense verdict. On this appeal, plaintiff raises contentions of instructional error and improper evidentiary…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. Francis Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  2. Sheehan v. FlynnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  3. Keys v. RomleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Sheffet v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Lussier v. San Lorenzo Valley Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Central & West Basin Water Replenishment District v. Southern California Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 2003
  2. Rancho Viejo v. TRES AMIGOS VIEJOSCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  3. Contra Costa County v. Pinole Point Properties, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. Walnut Creek Manor, LLC v. Mayhew Center, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2009
  5. LOMBARD ACCEPTANCE v. Town of San AnselmoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API