Legal Opinion

Perlstein v. Wolk

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 2006No. 98909Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

844 N.E.2d 923 (2006)

218 Ill.2d 448

300 Ill.Dec. 480

Deena PERLSTEIN et al., Appellees,

v.

Maurice WOLK et al., Appellants.

No. 98909.

Supreme Court of Illinois.

February 17, 2006.

Gino L. DiVito and Daniel I. Konieczny, of Tabet, DiVito & Rothstein, L.L.C., Chicago, for appellants.

Thomas W. Gooch III and Melissa G. Massey, Wauconda, for appellees.

2Opinion of the Court · FitzgeraldJustice Fitzgerald

Plaintiffs Deena Perlstein and Scott Schneider filed a legal malpractice action against defendants Maurice Wolk and Ross & Hardies. Plaintiffs relied on the limitations period for malpractice actions set forth in section 13-214.3 of the Code of Civil…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Norton v. Shelby CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Best v. Taylor MacHine WorksIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Wilson v. ClarkIllinois Supreme Court · 1981

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API