Legal Opinion

Farkas v. Monk

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 13, 1904PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Complaint. Before Judge Covington. City court of Moultrie. September 2,1903.

1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.

1. It is too late, at the trial term of a case, for the plaintiff to file an amendment to a demurrer to the defendant’s plea, setting up new and distinct grounds of objection thereto. Civil Code, §§ 5045, 5047; City Council v. Lombard, 101 Ga. 724.

2. The answer of the defendant set forth a good defense, it being alleged that the note sued on was obtained from him by reason of the false and fraudulent representations of the plaintiff that he held a fi. fa. against another, under whom the defendant claimed title to certain land, the lien of which fi. fa. was superior to and antedated a deed…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City Council v. LombardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tillman v. BomarSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  2. Kullman, Salz & Co. v. Sugar Apparatus Mfg. Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. MotzSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  4. Stembridge v. Family Finance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API