Hausman v. Buchman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendants, Liber Buchman and others, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiffs, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 2d day of June, 1919, upon the verdict of a jury.
1Opinion of the Court
Laughlin, J.:.
This is an action on a contract made between the parties on the 9th day of October, 1918. The plaintiffs were engaged in the cotton goods business in the city of New York as copartners, and the defendants were engaged in business at the same place. It is to be inferred from the testimony that the defendants were negotiating a contract with the government for pillows in the performance of which they would require a considerable quantity of cotton ticking. On the 27th day of September, 1918, the plaintiffs wrote the defendants, confirming a telephone conversation, stating that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lamb v. . Norcross Brothers Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1913
- Moore v. . MeachamNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
- Oswego Falls Pulp & Paper Co. v. Stecher Lithographic Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
3Cited by5 opinions
- Atlantic City Tire & Rubber Corp. v. Southwark Foundry & MacHine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Frankel v. Foreman & Clark, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
- Knudsen Music Co. v. MastersonUtah Supreme Court · 1952
- Pierson & Co. v. Nederlandsch-Indische Maatschappij tot Voortzetting der Zaken Van Der LindeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Atlantic City Tire & Rubber Corp. v. Southwark Foundry & MacHine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927