Legal Opinion
Stowe Township v. Standard Life Insurance Company of Indiana
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 24, 1975No. 74-1409PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ADAMS, Circuit Judge.
The issue presented on this appeal is whether the plaintiff made out a prima facie case to reform a group annuity contract. We conclude that insufficient evidence was produced to sustain the finding of reformation, and consequently vacate the judgment of the district court, 372 F.Supp. 433.
a.
To secure retirement benefits for its municipal employees and commissioners, plaintiff Stowe Township, prior to 1970, entered into a series of individual deferred annuity policies with the defendant Standard Life Insurance Company of Indiana. Each individual…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- General Electric Credit Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Easton v. Washington County InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- William L. Bracey, Jr. v. John GrenobleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- Eckenrode v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
- Overholt Et Ux. v. Reliance Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- SI Handling Systems, Inc. v. HeisleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc. v. BotticellaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Giant Eagle, Inc. v. Federal InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- Indian Harbor Insurance v. F & M Equipment, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- Sandgren v. Fire Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.