Legal Opinion

White v. City of Findlay

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1923No. 18026Published

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

Plaintiff in error was arrested and convicted of unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor in violation of an ordinance of the city of Findlay, Ohio. The Findlay ordinance, in so far as it relates to this case, is in terms identical with the so-called Crabbe Act, which appears in 108 Ohio Laws, part 2, page 1182.

The conviction was affirmed in the Court of Appeals. The plaintiff in error comes into this court as a matter of right, claiming that the act is unconstitutional because of an alleged discrimination and immunity existing in the act in favor of occupants *476or owners of bona fide private…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gundling v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Welsh v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Howell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  4. Austin v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1847
  5. In re BickerstaffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API