Legal Opinion

Weinstock v. Holden

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 1, 1999No. 81322PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Article XIII, section 3 of the Missouri Constitution was adopted by the voters of Missouri as a part of their Constitution in 1994. The article establishes a Citizen’s Commission to review, study, and fix the relationship of compensation to the duties of all elected state officials, legislators, and judges. The schedule of compensation established by the Citizen’s Commission is “effective” if not disapproved by the general assembly, but “subject to appropriations”. Kenneth Weinstock brought this lawsuit to challenge the legislature’s disapproval of the Citizen’s Commission’s 1996 schedule of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Clark v. AustinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  2. In Re Proceedings Against Richards for DisbarmentSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  3. Bank of Washington v. McAuliffeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  4. State Ex Rel. Jones v. AtterburySupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  5. Missouri Coalition for the Environment v. Joint Committee on Administrative RulesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Norman Seay v. Tim JonesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Butte County, Idaho v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
  3. Opinion No. (2011), Missouri Attorney General Reports2011
  4. Peggy Stevens McGraw and Samuel C. Jones, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated v. State of Missouri, Missouri State Employees' Retirement System, Missouri Commissioner of Administration Doug Nelson, and Missouri State Treasurer Clint ZweifelSupreme Court of Missouri · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API