Legal Opinion

Norman v. Van Elsberg

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1972PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, C.J.

This is a proceeding filed pursuant to ORS 27.010-27.030 permitting a controversy to be submitted without action or suit. ①

The question presented is whether the Board of County Commissioners of Coos County has the authority to decrease admittedly reasonable salaries of juvenile department personnel fixed by the judges of the juvenile court.

The trial court held that the board did not have such authority. The Court of Appeals reversed. We allowed plaintiffs’ petition for review.

The facts are set out in detail in the opinion of the Court of Appeals (7 Or App 66, 489 P2d 394); we shall briefly…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Smith v. MillerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
  2. NOBLE CTY. COUNCIL ETC. v. State Ex Rel. FiferIndiana Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Powers v. IsleyArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Bass v. County of SalineNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Mann v. County of MaricopaArizona Supreme Court · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. In Re the Salary of the Juvenile DirectorWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Morgan County Commission v. PowellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  3. Mowrer v. RuskNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Sadler v. Oregon State BarOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Employees & Judge of the Second Judicial District Court v. Hillsdale CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API