Warthen v. Himstreet
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Warren District Court. —Hon. J. H. Apple-gate, Judge. This is an action in equity, tbe particulars of winch will be set out in the opinion. From a decree dismissing the petition, plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtWaterman, J.
Defendant Himstreet and plaintiff were sureties on tire note of A. L. Warthen. Himstreet paid the note, and thereafter brought suit against plaintiff and A. L. Warthen for the amount due on the note and attorney’s fees. He obtained judgmentfor the sum claimed. After a time, some land of M. A. Warthen being sold, an amount sufficient to pay said judgment was reserved out of the purchase price by defendants Carruthers & Son, who paid therefrom to Him-street one-ha-lf the amount of his judgment, and still retain the remainder, awaiting the result of this action. It is claimed the judgment…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bosch v. KassingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
- Shricker v. FieldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
- Doyle v. ReillySupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
3Cited by6 opinions
- Tube City Mining & Milling Co. v. OttersonArizona Supreme Court · 1914
- Kwentsky v. SirovySupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Ruppin v. McLachlanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Ulber v. DunnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Ashby v. ManleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.