Legal Opinion · Dissent

Logal v. Cruse

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 8, 1975No. 3-675A106Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion

Staton, P.J.

— I dissent. Indiana Rules of Procedure, Trial Rule 60(B) permits a motion to be filed within a year after judgment.1 The Rule provides in part:

“(B) Mistake — Excusable neglect — Newly discovered evidence — Fraud, etc. On motion and upon such terms as are just the court may relieve a party or his legal representative from a final judgment, order, default or proceeding for the following reasons:(1) mistake, surprise, or excusable neglect;(2) any ground for a motion to correct error, including without limitation newly discovered evidence, which by due diligence…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Austin Joseph Ryan v. United States Lines CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  2. Roy Ferrell v. Trailmobile, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  3. Binks Manufacturing Company, Etc. v. Ransburg Electro-Coating Corporation, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960
  4. Joseph A. Weiss v. Emerich HunnaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  5. Binks Mfg. Co. v. Ransburg Electro-Coating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API