Legal Opinion

Gallant v. TODD

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 4, 1960No. 17599PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Oxner, Justice.

Counsel for appellant say in their brief that the single question presented by this appeal is whether the following instrument authorized Horton Bros. Co., Inc., a real-estate broker, to execute a contract of sale in behalf of Mrs. Adville M. Todd:

“Agreement
“Date 6/12/58
“I hereby authorize Horton Bros. Co., Inc., Anderson, S. C. to sell for me the below described property of which I am owner, making them my sole agent for that purpose, and in case sale of said property is made by them or by anyone else, I do hereby contract and agree to pay them 5 Per Cent Commission on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Halsey v. MorteiroSupreme Court of Virginia · 1896
  2. Wharton v. TolbertSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1909
  3. Shillinglaw v. SimsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1910
  4. Edwards v. ColemanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
  5. Bolen v. SMITHSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Holland v. HannanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Forbis v. HoneycuttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Bernstein v. Yee WongDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1964
  4. Management Clearing, Inc. v. VanceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  5. Plunkett v. MarshNorthumberland County Circuit Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API