Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Barker

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 27, 2010No. 29A02-0910-CV-1004PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAKER, Chief Judge.

The trust at issue herein held certain real estate that the settlor intended to be sold, with the proceeds to be distributed to the beneficiaries. For a time, the trustee delayed selling the real estate for valid reasons. He continued to delay to sell the property, however, until over a year past the point at which those reasons no longer existed. His inaction constituted a breach of fiduciary duty. His breach may have caused the corpus of the trust to suffer significant financial harm, and his general reluctance and/or refusal to communicate with the beneficiaries…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gavin v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Hardy v. HardyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Matter of Willey's TrustIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Goins v. RiddleIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Eiteljorg v. EiteljorgIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Eiteljorg v. EiteljorgIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. In the Matter of the Living Trust Agreement of Virgil C. Morningstar and Agnes M. Morningstar, Teresa J. Morningstar v. Nina Fortunka and STAR Financial BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. In the Matter of the Trust of H. Paul Lauster, and Mary E. Lauster, Christopher D. Lauster v. John M. Lauster and David P. Lauster (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API