Legal Opinion · Dissent

Zak v. Fidelity-Phenix Insurance

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 26, 1965No. Gen. 49,710Published

1DissentBtjrman, P. J.

The plaintiff in this case seeks a declaration that the defendant insurance company is liable under its automobile liability insurance policy for damages arising out of an automobile collision in which she was involved and which occurred some time after the insurance company had cancelled the policy. The issue presented is whether the cancellation was effective.

The cancellation provisions of the policy and the notice of cancellation are set out in the majority opinion. I believe, and the plaintiff admits, that under the proper interpretation of the cancellation provision, the defendant had…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dorfman v. GerberIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Leslie v. Standard Accident InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1945
  3. Coons v. Home Life Insurance Co. New YorkIllinois Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Scapes v. OrrAppellate Court of Illinois · 1954
  5. Jablonski v. Washington County Mutual Fire InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API