Legal Opinion

Ameriprise Financial, Inc. v. Charles E. Vallandingham (Judge White, dissenting)

Intermediate Court of Appeals of West Virginia

Decided June 12, 2025No. 24-ica-340Separate

1Opinion of the Court

No. 24-ICA-340 – Ameriprise Financial, Inc. v. Charles E. Vallandingham FILED June 12, 2025 WHITE, Judge, dissenting: ASHLEY N. DEEM, CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA It has long been a fundamental principle of the law that “[a] rogue cannot protect himself from liability for his fraud by inserting a printed clause in his contract.” Ernst Iron Works v. Duralith Corp.,

200 N.E. 683, 684

(N.Y. 1936). The majority opinion dispenses with this principle and creates a new one, holding that a boilerplate clause slipped into a contract of adhesion can absolve the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Dallas Aerospace, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Cis Air Corporation, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  2. Danann Realty Corp. v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
  3. Forest Oil Corp. v. McAllenTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  4. McEvoy Travel Bureau, Inc. v. Norton Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  5. Grumman Allied Industries, Inc. And Grumman Corporation v. Rohr Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API