Legal Opinion

Quanah, A. & P. Ry. Co. v. Chumbley

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 4, 1914No. 645PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Cottle County Court; W. E. Prescott, Judge. Action by J. M. Chumbley and others against the Quanah, Acme & Pacific Railway Company and others. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtHendbicks, J.

This suit was originally instituted in the county court of Cottle county by J. M. Chumbley'against the Quanah, Acme & Pacific Bailway Company for damages alleged to have arisen on account of a shipment of one car of horses from Paducah to Whitewright, Tex., and thereafter George C. Chumbley intervened in said suit, as the alleged partner of J. M. Chumbley, and the Ft. Worth & Denver City Bailway Company and the Missouri, Kansas & Texas Bailway Company were also made parties defendant. The live stock contract evidences a shipment of the horses by “Chumbley & Son,” as the consignors, to G. A.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cleveland & Cameron v. HeidenheimerTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Gulf, T. & W. Ry. Co. v. CulverCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  4. Evans v. FrisbieTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Southern Kansas Railway Co. v. MorrisTexas Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Texas Midland R. R. v. FoglemanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  2. Texas Midland R. R. v. Becker & ColeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  3. Horton v. Texas Midland R. R.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  4. Byrne v. Texas Lumber & Loan Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  5. Elliott v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API