Wedan v. State
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PARKER, Judge.
Appellant Gary Wedan was convicted of second-degree criminal sexual conduct in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.343 (1984). On appeal from a post-conviction relief hearing he contends the evidence was insufficient to sustain the conviction and that he was denied a fair trial because the trial court limited the cross-examination of one witness, the State did not disclose an expert’s notes until the day of trial, and the State’s expert expressed an opinion regarding the complainant’s truthfulness. We affirm.
FACTS
Wedan’s conviction was based on evidence that he engaged in…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- State v. MerrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- State v. UlvinenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. TureSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. DanielsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- State v. CaswellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. BorgCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- State v. WilburCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989