Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Ewing v. Colonel Biggs Water Ski Show Team

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 30, 2014No. 1130229Published

1ConcurrenceMoore, Chief Justice

I concur in denying the petition for the writ of mandamus. I write separately to emphasize that the petition before us demonstrates why this • Court should avoid meddling in discovery matters before the trial court. In Ex parte USA Water Ski Inc., 135 So.3d 247 (Ala.2013), this Court held that a certain post-accident report was privileged under the work-product doctrine and directed the trial court to vacate its order compelling USA Water Ski, Inc., to produce the post-accident report. Although I did not write, I dissented for the reasons I dissented in Ex parte Mobile Gas Service Corp., 123…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Ocwen Federal Bank, FSBSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  2. Parker v. Mobile Gas Service Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2013
  3. Ewing v. Colonel Biggs Water Ski Show TeamSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API