Legal Opinion
Curtis v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided December 7, 1977No. 2-476A136PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, P.J.
—Richard Curtis and Kevin Satterfield each appeal the denial of their respective Petitions for Post-Conviction Relief. Because of the similarity of issues presented, we heretofore consolidated the causes pursuant to Ind. Rules of Procedure, Appellate Rule 5(b).
On October 15,1973, Curtis was found guilty of assault and battery with intent to commit a felony, to-wit: rape. His sentence for the indeterminate period of one to ten years was suspended and he was placed on probation for two years under specific conditions, one of which stated:
“1. You shall not commit another criminal offense, either…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. Ross Joseph StradaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Anthony SciutoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
- Hoffa v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1977
- Pearson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jackson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- State v. EllefsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. MalbroughCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1980
- Thornton v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. DawsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.