Legal Opinion
Rosenbaum v. Dunn
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided November 6, 1975No. 50984; 50985PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Clark, Judge.
Our consideration of this appeal and the cross appeal is divided into three segments. These are: (1) A motion to dismiss the appeal as to one of the two judgments appealed from, that being a summary judgment granted third-party defendants, Hertz Corporation and its insurer, Royal Indemnity Company; (2) the main case in which C. W. Dunn obtained a judgment against Howard G. Rosenbaum as defendant; and (3) the third-party action brought by Rosenbaum against Hertz and Royal Indemnity Company in which a summary judgment was rendered for these third-party defendants.
On September…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hodges v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
- Empire Mills Co. v. Burrell Engineering & Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
- Ditmyer v. American Liberty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- Doe v. MossCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Railey v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Smith v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
- Dunn v. Royal Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1978