Legal Opinion

Eastern Connecticut Citizens Action Group v. Arthur B. Powers

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 7, 1983No. 400, Docket 83-7544PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IRVING R. KAUFMAN, Circuit Judge:

The right to communicate freely with one’s fellow citizens and with the government' on issues of public importance is a cornerstone of our American polity. The broad precepts of the First Amendment protect those who seek “peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” Expression of views on political issues must, however, be accomplished without unduly disrupting the orderly functioning of government. Accommodating the right of public speech and the state’s need to discharge its responsibilities to its citizenry efficiently…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Forsyth County v. Nationalist MovementSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Santa Monica Food Not Bombs v. City of Santa MonicaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  3. Kwong v. BloombergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  4. Planned Parenthood Association/chicago Area, an Illinois Not-For-Profit Corporation v. Chicago Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  5. Sullivan v. City of AugustaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API