Eastern Connecticut Citizens Action Group v. Arthur B. Powers
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
IRVING R. KAUFMAN, Circuit Judge:
The right to communicate freely with one’s fellow citizens and with the government' on issues of public importance is a cornerstone of our American polity. The broad precepts of the First Amendment protect those who seek “peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” Expression of views on political issues must, however, be accomplished without unduly disrupting the orderly functioning of government. Accommodating the right of public speech and the state’s need to discharge its responsibilities to its citizenry efficiently…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Forsyth County v. Nationalist MovementSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Santa Monica Food Not Bombs v. City of Santa MonicaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Kwong v. BloombergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Planned Parenthood Association/chicago Area, an Illinois Not-For-Profit Corporation v. Chicago Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Sullivan v. City of AugustaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.