Legal Opinion
Casper v. Higgins
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided May 27, 1935PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By ROSS, PJ.
At the outset, the evidence is conclusive that the last allegation of the reply is not supported. In Bloom v Leech, Admr., 130 Oh St, 339, the Supreme Court has at considerable length and with great care reviewed the several circumstances incident to the operation of motor vehicles by those having a joint interest in the general ob jectives involving the use of the vehicle. A reading of the record convinces us that while the plaintiff was jointly interested in the general objectives of the trip, he had absolutely no control over the operation of the vehicle, an essential…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- De Shetler v. KordtOhio Court of Appeals · 1931
- Central Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. State Automobile Mut Ins.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1934
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ramona Freeman, Etc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- Lester v. John R. Jurgensen Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- Spring v. LilesOregon Supreme Court · 1963
- Whittecar v. CheathamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
- Robe v. AgerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.