State Ex Rel. Chobot v. Circuit Court for Milwaukee County
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHallows, C. J.
Chobot contends: (1) That sec. 944.21 (1) (a), Stats., is unconstitutionally vague under Miller v. California and companion cases 1 as written and as *358heretofore construed by this court; (2) that to.meet the standards of definiteness, this court may not reconstrue the section so that it contains the test of obscenity formulated in Miller; and (3) even if this court re-construes the section, such construction cannot be retroactively applied to his prior acts.
There is no definition of “obscenity” in sec. 944.21 (1) (a), Stats., which provides:
“Lewd, obscene or indecent matter, pictures and…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Strykowski v. WilkieWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. HartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. PetroneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. Princess Cinema of Milwaukee, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Commonwealth v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.