Sunoco, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Protection
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY Senior
Judge JIULIANTE.
Sunoco, Inc. (R&M) (hereinafter “Suno-co”) petitions for review of the April 12, 2004 order of the Environmental Hearing Board (EHB) that denied Sunoco’s appeal from a $3,465,660 civil penalty assessed under Section 9.1 of the Air Pollution Control Act (APCA) 1 based upon Sunoco’s failure to install Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) on a timely basis on Boilers 6 and 7 at its Marcus Hook Refinery in Delaware County. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
Sunoco’s Marcus Hook Refinery (the Facility) is located within the Philadelphia Consolidated…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Allegheny Ludlum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Birdsboro & Birdsboro Municipal Authority v. Department of Environmental ProtectionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Pennsylvania Department of Environmental ProtectionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- American Auto Wash, Inc. v. Department of Environmental ProtectionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Shawnee Development, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Groce v. Department of Environmental ProtectionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Eureka Stone Quarry, Inc. v. Department of Environmental ProtectionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- United Refining Co. v. Department of Environmental ProtectionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Lower Salford Township Authority v. Department of Environmental ProtectionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- City of Philadelphia v. Int'l Ass'n of Firefighters, Local 22, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.