Van Slyck v. . Woodruff
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal in each of the above-entitled actions from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 8, 1907, which reversed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term and granted a new trial in an action to set aside a transfer of. trade marks on the ground of fraud.
1Per curiam
These actions were brought by the plaintiff as the representative of certain judgment creditors of a common debtor to set aside several transfers of personal property as made with intent to hinder, delay and defraud creditors, or to effect an unlawful preference. In each action the judgment rendered by the- trial court in favor of the plaintiff was reversed by the Appellate Division both on the law and the facts. The record clearly and unmistakably shows that questions of fact were involved in each action, and that those questions were decided in favor of the plaintiff by the trial court, but…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Kraus v. . BirnbaumNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Tousey v. . HastingsNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
- Merkel v. LazardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910