Legal Opinion

United States v. Board of Com'rs

District Court, E.D. Oklahoma

Decided March 19, 1921No. Nos. 2594, 2621, 3184PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Three separate suits by the United States against the Board of Commissioners of McIntosh County, against W. W. Stuckey, Treasurer of Tulsa County, and against J. P. Ranson, Treasurer of McIntosh County.

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, District Judge.

The following questions are involved in the above styled and numbered cause:(1) Are lands: theretofore taxable under the state laws, and after-wards purchased under the supervision of the Secretary of-the Interior from their bona fide non-Indian owners with royalties accruing under such supervision to a full-blood Creek Indian from part of her restricted allotment, exempted or freed from state táxation by virtue of the clause inserted by the grantor in .the deed to her under the direction of and at the instance of and requirement of the Secretary of the Interior,…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Knowlton v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Pollard's Lessee v. HAGANSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  5. Weston and Others v. the City Council of CharlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1829

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Ferry CountyDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API