Legal Opinion

Messinger v. Union Warehouse Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1902PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From Sherman : „ W. L. Bradshaw, Judge. Unsuccessful replevin by F. R. Messinger against the Union Warehouse Company. Affirmed.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore

This is an action to recover the possession of four hundred and eight sacks of wlieat, or the sum of $474.50, its alleged value, in case possession thereof can not be secured. The following statement of facts is deemed essential to a clear understanding of the questions involved : Congress on February 25, 1867, granted to the State of Oregon, to aid in the construction of a wagon road from The Dalles to Fort Boise, the “alternate sections of public lands designated by odd numbers to the extent of *547three sections in width on each side of said road,” which the state on October 20,1868, granted…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Patterson v. HaydenOregon Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Smith v. ShattuckOregon Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Wilcox v. Eastern Oregon Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. Salomon v. CressOregon Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Cooper v. McGgrewOregon Supreme Court · 1880

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Devereaux Mortgage Co. v. WalkerIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
  2. De Wolfe v. KupersOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Abernethy v. UhlmanOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Balla v. IrelandOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Halsey v. SimmonsOregon Supreme Court · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API