Kenecht v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
BBOOKS, Judge.
This is a conviction for violating the local option law.
Bill of exceptions Ko. 1 complains that when the panel was presented to appellant from which to select a jury, there were five men on the panel who had sat in the courthouse and had heard the testimony of the State’s witness Jenkins, in the trial of the case against one King, which grew out of the same state of facts upon which appellant was tried; that by reason of these jurors having heard said testimony that they were disqualified from sitting in the case, and the defendant peremptorily challenged the said jurors. The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Anderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
- Bowman v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1874
- Arnold v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
- Kuhn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hoy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1938