Legal Opinion · Dissent

Dubray v. Coeur Rochester, Inc.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1996No. 25883Published

1Dissent

Springer, J., with whom Rose, J., agrees,

dissenting:

When reviewing administrative decisions, a district court must “review evidence presented to the agency in order to determine whether the agency’s decision was arbitrary or capricious and thus an abuse of the agency’s discretion.” Installation & Dismantle v. SIIS, 110 Nev. 930, 932, 879 P.2d 58, 59 (1994). A district court shall set aside an agency’s decision in whole or in part if it is “clearly erroneous in view of the reliable, probative and substantial evidence on the whole record.” NRS 233B.135(3)(e). The SIIS decision is certainly not…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Installation & Dismantle, Inc. v. State Industrial Insurance SystemNevada Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API