Herrmann v. Osborne Co.

On May 14, 1925, a notice for defendant’s examination and a subpcena duces tecum were served upon one Kartel, the manager of its New York office. He appeared for examination pursuant to the notice and subpoena but brought no books or records with him. In the course of his examination he testified he had no access to these documents which were in Newark at the home office of defendant, a New Jersey corporation. The examination was adjourned for the purpose of having plaintiff’s *860counsel inform the attorney for defendant just what papers or writings he felt he was entitled to examine and wished…