Kenneth Glenn Benscoter v. The United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HURRAH, Chief Judge.
The appeal in this criminal case involves primarily the recurring question of the propriety of the trial court’s supplemental instructions to an apparently deadlocked jury in which he urged them to reach a verdict.
Since this case was briefed and argued, we have again reviewed the case law and- cautiously reaffirmed the propriety of a so-called Allen charge, provided the jury is explicitly given to understand that each of them is perfectly free to follow the dictates of his own conscientiously held views on guilt or innocence. See Burrup v. United States, 10 Cir., 371 F.2d…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Jenkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. James Hugh RogersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1961
- Grady B. Burroughs, Also Known as Sam Grady Biggs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
- Donald R. Elbel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- John L. Sullivan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Miles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1979
- Elmer v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1969
- Elmer v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1969
- Miles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.