Legal Opinion

Cargill, Incorporated v. Marigold, Incorporated

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided November 16, 2023No. 2:21-cv-00402Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION CARGILL, INCORPORATED, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) NO. 2:21 CV 402-PPS ) MARIGOLD, INCORPORATED, ) ) Defendant. ) OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Cargill, Incorporated, filed a motion for default judgment against the remaining defendant in this case Marigold, Incorporated, for breach of contract, debt owed under an account stated, and unjust enrichment. [DE 30.] The request is well supported by an Affidavit of Eldin Hasic (attorney of record for Cargill), as well as exhibits to the complaint documenting the contract between…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mike Yang v. Paul HardinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  2. Dundee Cement Company v. Howard Pipe & Concrete Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  3. E360 INSIGHT v. the Spamhaus ProjectCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  4. Muriel D. Black v. Michael P. Lane, Michael Neal, P.A. Severs, CaptainCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. Salvatore Di Mucci, Robert Di Mucci and Anthony Di MucciCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API