Roebuck v. Valentine-Radford, Inc.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HANNA, Judge.
The trial court directed a verdict at the close of the plaintiffs evidence on his claims for breach of contract and § 290.110, RSMo 1994, quantum meruit, negligence, and punitive damages. The court submitted plaintiffs claims for conversion and fraud. The jury found in defendants’ favor on the two claims submitted. On appeal, the plaintiff contests the trial court’s granting defendants’ directed verdict and the admission of certain evidence.
The defendant, Valentine-Radford, Inc., (V-R) is engaged in the advertising business with offices in Kansas City. The defendant Mark Spence…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Seabaugh v. Milde Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- City of Kennett v. AkersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
- Cavic v. Missouri Research Laboratories, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1967
- Mease v. McGuireMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
- Koehler v. Warren Skinner, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Valentine-Radford, Inc. v. American Motorists Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- Idris Abdus-Shahid v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore City, et al.District Court, D. Maryland · 2026