Legal Opinion

Bick v. Umstattd

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 23, 1909PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Monroe Circuit Court. — Eon. David E. Eby, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtReynolds, P. J.

— This case comes to this court on an order or judgment in the following form:

“Now on this second day of September, 1905, come the parties herein by their respective attorneys, and the motion heretofore filed by the plaintiff herein to strike out part of the third amended separate answer filed herein by defendant William Davis is taken up and is by the court sustained and the court upon its own motion rules that the petition filed herein is insufficient and does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against the defendants, wherefore the plaintiff declines and refuses'to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Reesman v. RollinsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1904
  2. A. A. Cooper Wagon & Buggy Co. v. CornellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908
  3. State v. Wealaka M. & M. Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1905

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Moormeister v. HannibalMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API