Legal Opinion

Arango v. United States Department of the Treasury

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided June 24, 1997No. 95-5267PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’NEILL, Senior District Judge:

Appellant William Alberto Arango appeals the dismissal of his complaint challenging the administrative forfeiture of $476,590 seized from his home. Arango’s complaint alleges that the Customs Service denied him due process of law by arbitrarily and capriciously rejecting his proof of indigence, thus requiring him to post bond to obtain a judicial forfeiture hearing. Because we find that Customs afforded Arango an adequate opportunity to prove his eligibility for waiver of the bond requirement and reached a decision rationally based on the facts before it, we…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Tourus Records, Inc. v. Drug Enforcement AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
  2. Gerardo Serrano v. U.S. Customs and BorderCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
  3. Fernando Mesa Valderrama v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  4. United States Steel Corp. v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
  5. Miami-Dade County v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API