Legal Opinion

Farley v. Moore's Building Supplies (In Re Farley)

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided April 29, 1982No. Bankruptcy No. 3-81-00968, Adv. No. 3-81-0999PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

CLIVE W. BARE, Bankruptcy Judge.

This is an adversary proceeding wherein plaintiff seeks to avoid a judicial lien held by the defendant. 11 U.S.C. § 522(f)(1). The defendant’s position is that the lien is not avoidable under 11 U.S.C. § 522(f)(1) because the plaintiff has no equity in the property to which the lien attached. The facts relevant to the present proceeding have been stipulated by the parties:

1. On June 5, 1980, Moore’s Building Supplies filed a Knox County Chancery Court lawsuit against John Farley, his wife, and other parties not involved in the present case. The suit…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Giles v. Credithrift of America, Inc. (In Re Giles)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1981
  2. Pine v. Credithrift of America, Inc. (In Re Pine)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1981
  3. Pine v. Credithrift of America, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1982
  4. Giles v. Credithrift of America, Inc. (In Re Giles)District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gunter v. GMAC Financing Corp. (In Re Gunter)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1989
  2. Shelton v. Wells (In Re Shelton)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Missouri · 1983
  3. In Re CheekUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Missouri · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API