Legal Opinion
City of New Orleans v. Kirzner
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided March 14, 1984No. CA-1896PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REDMANN, Chief Judge.
We deny our own motion to dismiss this appeal from a judgment not signed until six days after the motion for appeal. (C.C.P. 1911 allows appeal only from a signed judgment.) The matter is controlled by In the Matter of Parker, 399 So.2d 607 (La.1981), reversing the First Circuit, 395 So.2d 373.
The First Circuit distinguishes Parker in Painter v. Continental Union Assur. Co., 407 So.2d 500 (La.App. 1 Cir.1981), and in Brown v. Brown, 421 So.2d 952 (La.App. 1 Cir.1982), on the basis that Parker contained written “reasons for judgment” that might have been interpreted as a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Nomey v. State, Department of HighwaysLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
- Palmer v. WrenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
- Reed v. Superior MotorsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
- Painter v. Continental Union Assurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
- Richards v. GettysLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. MartinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1986
- State v. LampkinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
- State v. GoodleyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- State of Louisiana v. Christopher Goodly -Aka- Christopher Bryant GoodlyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016