Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Hey

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1908PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the Fourth District ;—heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Randolph county; the Hon. Charles T. Moore, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cartwright

The appellees, John E. Wilson and John T. Wilson, are partners, and have been engaged in business many years in Sparta, a city of Randolph county, having a population of 3000 at the last census. Their business has been that of liverymen, hackmen and draymen, and they have owned and used a large number of teams, wagons and vehicles furnished to the public for hire. Their business included hauling freight for merchants and others, and carrying passengers, boarding horses for customers, furnishing storage for a hearse and a team for hauling the hearse. They also owned a building known as the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Doremus v. HennessyIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  2. O'Brien v. People ex rel. Kellogg Switchboard & Supply Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1905
  3. London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. HornIllinois Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Truax v. CorriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Carpenters' Union v. Citizens Committee to Enforce the Landis AwardIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. United Retail, Wholesale & Department Store Employees of AmericaIllinois Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Kemp v. Division No. 241, Amalgamated Ass'n of Street & Electric Railway Employees of AmericaIllinois Supreme Court · 1912
  5. A. T. Stearns Lumber Co. v. HowlettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API