Legal Opinion

United States v. Michael Reynolds

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 13, 2011No. 11-1839UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Michael Curtis Reynolds appeals pro se from the order of the District Court denying various motions in his criminal proceeding. We will affirm.

I

In 2007, a federal jury found Reynolds guilty of multiple terrorism-related crimes and the District Court sentenced him to 360 months of imprisonment. We affirmed the convictions in 2010. See United States v. Reynolds, 374 Fed.Appx. 356, 363 (3d Cir.2010). Among other things, we rejected Reynolds’s arguments that the affidavit of probable cause used to arrest him contained intentional misstatements and that certain witnesses had committed…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. United States v. Quentin Miller, A/K/A "Q" Quentin MillerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  3. Herring v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  5. In re ReynoldsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Reynolds v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API