Legal Opinion

Rose v. Gladden

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1967PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOODRICH, J. (Pro Tempore).

The petitioner, hereinafter called defendant, appeals from the trial court’s judgment in a post-conviction proceeding sustaining the validity of defendant’s guilty plea to the crime of assault with a dangerous weapon.

Defendant contends that the guilty plea was involuntary because induced by the bringing of a more severe criminal charge. The defendant was charged initially with the’ crime of assault with intent to Trill. After arraignment on this charge, defendant was furnished court-appointed counsel. Counsel discussed the charge with the defendant and advised him…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. MacHibroda v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Barber v. GladdenDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1963
  3. Lawson v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  4. State v. ScharbroughOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Reynolds v. ShobeOregon Supreme Court · 1967

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. ForcellaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
  2. Maloney v. CoinerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API