Legal Opinion

Brown v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 18, 2009No. 2D09-559PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

Joshua David Brown, in his petition filed in accordance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c), alleges that his appellate counsel was ineffective when he failed to argue that two of Brown’s three convictions for lewd or lascivious offenses in violation of section 800.04, Florida Statutes (2005), are prohibited by double jeopardy considerations. We agree that appellate counsel was ineffective in failing to raise the double jeopardy issue, and we conclude that Brown is entitled to a belated direct appeal on this issue only.

Brown was charged in a three-count information with one…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. MeshellSupreme Court of Florida · 2009
  2. Alvord v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  3. Gisi v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  4. Morman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  5. Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sanders v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  2. Lopez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  3. Del Valle v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  4. Horne v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  5. Drawdy v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API