Legal Opinion

Grow v. Prudential Trust Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 23, 1924PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBraley, J.

The only evidence before the jury was an auditor’s report in which he finds, that the defendant, which held funds of the plaintiff on deposit, paid out of those funds $13,410 on checks to which the plaintiff’s signature had been forged by one Joseph F. Minon. The judge, subject to the exceptions of the defendant, ordered a verdict for the plaintiff, and at the request of the parties reported “ the case to the full court for determination.”

It is well settled, that the defendant was bound to know the signature of its depositors, and payment of a forged check either over the counter, or through…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Jordan Marsh Co. v. National Shawmut BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  2. Greenfield Savings Bank v. StowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  3. Seaboard National Bank v. Bank of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  4. Welsh v. . German American BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  5. Dana v. National Bank of the RepublicMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Boston Five Cents Savings Bank v. BrooksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  2. Atlantic Transportation Co. v. Alexander Shipping Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  3. Wasilauskas v. Brookline Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  4. Barmby v. Merrimack Cooperative BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  5. Tapper v. Boston Penny Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API