Legal Opinion

Joe Oakley v. City of Memphis

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 8, 2008No. 07-6274UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SARGUS, District Judge.

Plaintiffs-Appellants appeal the decision of the district court granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee, the City of Memphis, and dismissing Appellants’ discrimination claims. For the reasons that follow, the decision of the district court is affirmed.

I

The 40 appellants are a racially mixed group of male and female lieutenants in the Memphis Police Department (“MPD”). Appellants allege that their employer, Ap-pellee, the City of Memphis (“City”), discriminated against them on the basis of gender and race by cancelling a valid, nondiscriminatory…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Shirley J. MITCHELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOLEDO HOSPITAL, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Joe Oakley v. City of MemphisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API