Joe Oakley v. City of Memphis
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SARGUS, District Judge.
Plaintiffs-Appellants appeal the decision of the district court granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee, the City of Memphis, and dismissing Appellants’ discrimination claims. For the reasons that follow, the decision of the district court is affirmed.
I
The 40 appellants are a racially mixed group of male and female lieutenants in the Memphis Police Department (“MPD”). Appellants allege that their employer, Ap-pellee, the City of Memphis (“City”), discriminated against them on the basis of gender and race by cancelling a valid, nondiscriminatory…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Shirley J. MITCHELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOLEDO HOSPITAL, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Joe Oakley v. City of MemphisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014