Legal Opinion · Dissent
City of Oklahoma City v. Oklahoma Tax Commission
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 1, 1990No. 68405Published
1Dissent
OPALA, Vice Chief Justice,
dissenting.
The court reverses today the nisi prius dismissal of Oklahoma City’s [City’s] lawsuit for failure to state a breach-of-contract claim and vacates the Court of Appeals' opinion which:(a) holds the City was' entitled to interest accrued to the State on sales tax revenue which the Oklahoma Tax Commission [Commission] collected for it and deposited with the State Treasurer [Treasurer] in a revolving fund account kept pursuant to the statutory regime then in force1 and(b) attributes “vendor” status to the Commission.
Today’s pronouncement rests on a legal theory…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hutto v. FinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.