Kelley v. State

MlKELL, Judge.

Following a jury trial, Mark Brian Kelley was convicted of enticing a child for indecent purposes and solicitation of sodomy.1 On appeal, Kelley raises two enumerations of error. He challenges the *44sufficiency of the evidence as to his conviction for enticing a child for indecent purposes and argues, alternatively, that the conviction should be reversed because the trial court failed to charge the jury on asportation. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

“On appeal from a criminal conviction, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, and the defendant no…