Legal Opinion

Florida Parole Commission v. Padovano

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 22, 1989No. Nos. 89-3023, 89-3035 and 89-3036PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The Florida Parole Commission petitions this court for writs of prohibition, contending the respondent circuit judges lack jurisdiction to consider mandamus petitions filed by inmates who are challenging their presumptive parole release dates (PPRDs).1 We deny relief.

Petitioner’s basic premise is that judicial review of PPRDs violates the separation of powers provision of Article II, section 3, of the Florida Constitution. That is, as section 947.18, Florida Statutes, gives the commission discretion as to which inmates are to be released on parole, petitioner contends judicial review of that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Moore v. Florida Parole and Probation CommissionSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
  2. Daniels v. Florida Parole & Probation Comm'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  3. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COM'N v. PaigeSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  4. Griffith v. FLORIDA PAROLE & PROBATION COM'NSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  5. Roberson v. FLA. PAROLE & PROBATION COM'NSupreme Court of Florida · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Campbell v. Florida Parole CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  2. Hunter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API